Cystatin C versus Creatinine in Determining Risk Based on Kidney Function

In this meta-analysis of 16 studies, investigators evaluated the use of cystatin C, alone or with creatinine, to calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Measurement of cystatin C improved the prediction of outcomes in chronic kidney disease. The estimated glomerular filtration rat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2013-09, Vol.369 (10), p.932-943
Hauptverfasser: Shlipak, Michael G, Matsushita, Kunihiro, Ärnlöv, Johan, Inker, Lesley A, Katz, Ronit, Polkinghorne, Kevan R, Rothenbacher, Dietrich, Sarnak, Mark J, Astor, Brad C, Coresh, Josef, Levey, Andrew S, Gansevoort, Ron T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this meta-analysis of 16 studies, investigators evaluated the use of cystatin C, alone or with creatinine, to calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Measurement of cystatin C improved the prediction of outcomes in chronic kidney disease. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is the clinical standard for the assessment of kidney function. 1 – 3 The eGFR thresholds for the definition and staging of chronic kidney disease are based on risk, 3 but measurement of creatinine to determine the eGFR has limitations in risk prediction, particularly in patients with reduced muscle mass. 4 Cystatin C has received much attention as an alternative filtration marker with stronger and more linear risk relationships than creatinine. 5 – 7 Several studies have suggested that the addition of cystatin C measurements to creatinine measurements in calculating the eGFR significantly improves the risk classification for death, cardiovascular . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1214234