Cystatin C versus Creatinine in Determining Risk Based on Kidney Function
In this meta-analysis of 16 studies, investigators evaluated the use of cystatin C, alone or with creatinine, to calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Measurement of cystatin C improved the prediction of outcomes in chronic kidney disease. The estimated glomerular filtration rat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2013-09, Vol.369 (10), p.932-943 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this meta-analysis of 16 studies, investigators evaluated the use of cystatin C, alone or with creatinine, to calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Measurement of cystatin C improved the prediction of outcomes in chronic kidney disease.
The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is the clinical standard for the assessment of kidney function.
1
–
3
The eGFR thresholds for the definition and staging of chronic kidney disease are based on risk,
3
but measurement of creatinine to determine the eGFR has limitations in risk prediction, particularly in patients with reduced muscle mass.
4
Cystatin C has received much attention as an alternative filtration marker with stronger and more linear risk relationships than creatinine.
5
–
7
Several studies have suggested that the addition of cystatin C measurements to creatinine measurements in calculating the eGFR significantly improves the risk classification for death, cardiovascular . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1214234 |