Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia: a prospective study on the incidence, platelet‐activating capacity and clinical significance of antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibodies of the IgG, IgM, and IgA classes
Introduction: Platelet‐activating antiplatelet factor 4/heparin (anti‐PF4/heparin) antibodies are the major cause of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). However, the relative utility of functional (platelet activation) vs. antigen [enzyme‐immunoassay (EIA)] assays, and the significance of assay...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis 2007-08, Vol.5 (8), p.1666-1673 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction: Platelet‐activating antiplatelet factor 4/heparin (anti‐PF4/heparin) antibodies are the major cause of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). However, the relative utility of functional (platelet activation) vs. antigen [enzyme‐immunoassay (EIA)] assays, and the significance of assay discrepancies remain unresolved.Methods: Consecutive patient sera (n = 1650) referred for diagnostic HIT testing were screened prospectively by both the heparin‐induced platelet activation (HIPA) test and anti‐PF4/heparin EIA – including individual classes (IgG, IgA, IgM) – with clinical correlations studied. Platelet microparticle and annexin‐V‐binding properties of the sera were also investigated.Results: Only 205 (12.4%) sera tested positive in either the HIPA and/or EIA: 95 (46.3%) were positive in both, 109 (53.1%) were only EIA‐positive, and, notably, only one serum was HIPA‐positive/EIA‐negative. Of 185 EIA‐positive sera, only 17.6% had detectable IgM and/or IgA without detectable IgG. Among sera positive for EIA IgG, optical density values were higher when the sera were HIPA‐positive (1.117 vs. 0.768; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1538-7933 1538-7836 1538-7836 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02617.x |