Routine developmental screening at 5.5 and 7 years of age is not an efficient predictor of attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder at age 10
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of developmental screening for deficits in attention, motor control and perception or attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (DAMP/ADHD) at 5.5 and 7 years of age for diagnosing ADHD in grade 4. Method: The study population consisted of 442...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta Paediatrica 2010-01, Vol.99 (1), p.112-120 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of developmental screening for deficits in attention, motor control and perception or attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (DAMP/ADHD) at 5.5 and 7 years of age for diagnosing ADHD in grade 4.
Method: The study population consisted of 442 children from a cohort study of ADHD in 10‐year olds in one municipality in Stockholm County. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of a developmental screening at 5.5 and at 7 years of age for being diagnosed with ADHD at 10 years of age was calculated.
Results: The sensitivity was 44%, the specificity 85% and the positive predictive value for having a diagnosis of pervasive ADHD in 4th grade was 15%, when at least two deviations in nine items was used as the cut‐off point in 5.5‐year screening at Child Health Centres (CHCs). With a cut‐off score of at least two deviations in four items rated by parents or and teachers in 1st grade, these estimates were 58%, 81% and 15% respectively.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that developmental screening for DAMP/ADHD at 5.5 and 7 years of age does not identify children who are diagnosed with ADHD in grade 4 with a high degree of selectivity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0803-5253 1651-2227 1651-2227 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01504.x |