3 10-Helix Conformation Facilitates the Transition of a Voltage Sensor S4 Segment toward the Down State
The activation of voltage-gated ion channels is controlled by the S4 helix, with arginines every third residue. The x-ray structures are believed to reflect an open-inactivated state, and models propose combinations of translation, rotation, and tilt to reach the resting state. Recently, experiments...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biophysical journal 2011, Vol.100 (6), p.1446-1454 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The activation of voltage-gated ion channels is controlled by the S4 helix, with arginines every third residue. The x-ray structures are believed to reflect an open-inactivated state, and models propose combinations of translation, rotation, and tilt to reach the resting state. Recently, experiments and simulations have independently observed occurrence of 3
10-helix in S4. This suggests S4 might make a transition from
α- to 3
10-helix in the gating process. Here, we show 3
10-helix structure between Q1 and R3 in the S4 segment of a voltage sensor appears to facilitate the early stage of the motion toward a down state. We use multiple microsecond-steered molecular simulations to calculate the work required for translating S4 both as
α-helix and transformed to 3
10-helix. The barrier appears to be caused by salt-bridge reformation simultaneous to R4 passing the F233 hydrophobic lock, and it is almost a factor-two lower with 3
10-helix. The latter facilitates translation because R2/R3 line up to face E183/E226, which reduces the requirement to rotate S4. This is also reflected in a lower root mean-square deviation distortion of the rest of the voltage sensor. This supports the 3
10 hypothesis, and could explain some of the differences between the open-inactivated- versus activated-states. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-3495 1542-0086 1542-0086 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.02.003 |