The limits of nonideal duties: a partial vindication of fair shares

Does the failure of others to comply with collective duties create duties for us to step in and do their share? Defenders of the so-called  duty to take up the slack  answer this question in the positive. Against their view, defenders of  fair shares  argue that we only have a duty to contribute our...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical review of international social and political philosophy 2024, p.1-22
1. Verfasser: Chahboun, Naima
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Does the failure of others to comply with collective duties create duties for us to step in and do their share? Defenders of the so-called  duty to take up the slack  answer this question in the positive. Against their view, defenders of  fair shares  argue that we only have a duty to contribute our fair share to discharging the collective duty. This paper offers a partial vindication of Liam Murphy’s account of fair shares. I argue that three common objections to fair shares fail to rebut Murphy’s account. On the reading I propose, fair shares may ground as – or more – extensive duties towards third parties as the duty to take up the slack. In addition, fair shares provides something that defenses of slack-taking tend to omit – an account of the limits of our nonideal duties. The paper highlights previously overlooked aspects of Murphy’s account and paves the way for future discussions about slack-taking in the domain of global politics.
ISSN:1369-8230
1743-8772
1743-8772
DOI:10.1080/13698230.2024.2311561