How a pure risk of harm can itself be a harm: A reply to Rowe
Rowe has recently argued that pure risk of harm cannot itself be a harm. I respond to Rowe and argue that given an appropriate understanding of objective probabilities, pure objective risk of harm can itself be a harm.
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Analysis (Oxford) 2024-02, Vol.84 (1), p.112-116 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Rowe has recently argued that pure risk of harm cannot itself be a harm. I respond to Rowe and argue that given an appropriate understanding of objective probabilities, pure objective risk of harm can itself be a harm. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-2638 1467-8284 1467-8284 |
DOI: | 10.1093/analys/anad055 |