Monitoring of the evolution of H 2 O vapor in the stratosphere of Jupiter over an 18-yr period with the Odin space telescope

Context. The comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 impacted Jupiter in July 1994, leaving its stratosphere with several new species, with water vapor (H 2 O) among them. Aims. With the aid of a photochemical model, H 2 O can be used as a dynamical tracer in the Jovian stratosphere. In this paper, we aim to constra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) 2020-09, Vol.641, p.A140
Hauptverfasser: Benmahi, B., Cavalié, T., Dobrijevic, M., Biver, N., Bermudez-Diaz, K., Sandqvist, Aa, Lellouch, E., Moreno, R., Fouchet, T., Hue, V., Hartogh, P., Billebaud, F., Lecacheux, A., Hjalmarson, Å., Frisk, U., Olberg, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Context. The comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 impacted Jupiter in July 1994, leaving its stratosphere with several new species, with water vapor (H 2 O) among them. Aims. With the aid of a photochemical model, H 2 O can be used as a dynamical tracer in the Jovian stratosphere. In this paper, we aim to constrain the vertical eddy diffusion ( K zz ) at levels where H 2 O is present. Methods. We monitored the H 2 O disk-averaged emission at 556.936 GHz with the space telescope between 2002 and 2019, covering nearly two decades. We analyzed the data with a combination of 1D photochemical and radiative transfer models to constrain the vertical eddy diffusion in the stratosphere of Jupiter. Results. Odin observations show us that the emission of H 2 O has an almost linear decrease of about 40% between 2002 and 2019. We can only reproduce our time series if we increase the magnitude of K zz in the pressure range where H 2 O diffuses downward from 2002 to 2019, that is, from ~0.2 mbar to ~5 mbar. However, this modified K zz is incompatible with hydrocarbon observations. We find that even if an allowance is made for the initially large abundances of H 2 O and CO at the impact latitudes, the photochemical conversion of H 2 O to CO 2 is not sufficient to explain the progressive decline of the H 2 O line emission, which is suggestive of additional loss mechanisms. Conclusions. The K zz we derived from the Odin observations of H 2 O can only be viewed as an upper limit in the ~0.2 mbar to ~5 mbar pressure range. The incompatibility between the interpretations made from H 2 O and hydrocarbon observations probably results from 1D modeling limitations. Meridional variability of H 2 O, most probably at auroral latitudes, would need to be assessed and compared with that of hydrocarbons to quantify the role of auroral chemistry in the temporal evolution of the H 2 O abundance since the SL9 impacts. Modeling the temporal evolution of SL9 species with a 2D model would naturally be the next step in this area of study.
ISSN:0004-6361
1432-0746
1432-0746
DOI:10.1051/0004-6361/202038188