Tensions and change in liminal spaces – Young people in Swedish out-of-home care

•Increased collaboration between the social services and psychiatric care is needed for young people in out-of-home care.•Out-of-home care - more containment than support to undergo change.•Experiences of liminality induce hopes and fears.•Lack of influence of the placement’s duration and content. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Children and youth services review 2024-02, Vol.157, p.107395, Article 107395
Hauptverfasser: Almqvist, Anna-Lena, Lassinantti, Kitty
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Increased collaboration between the social services and psychiatric care is needed for young people in out-of-home care.•Out-of-home care - more containment than support to undergo change.•Experiences of liminality induce hopes and fears.•Lack of influence of the placement’s duration and content. The objective of this paper is to further the understanding of young people’s experiences of out-of-home care (OHC). The focus will be on the tension between negative and positive experiences of OHC, refracted through the concept of liminality. The study is based on semi-structured interviews with 10 young people aged 15–22 (7 women, 3 men) with long-term contact with social services and psychiatric care. OHC can be experienced as a liminal space in both a negative and a positive sense. It is negative when perceived as containment rather than meaningful treatment. It can also be a negative experience when connected to fear, a lack of influence, and uncertainty in terms of being in between the social services and psychiatric care. It is positive when it is perceived as a turning point that enables positive change. It is then connected to feelings of meaningfulness, being respected, hope, and empowerment. The young people participating in the study also connect their experiences of OHC to a context of greater austerity in the welfare state. They reflect upon the benfits of OHC in terms of costs for society, but also the costs for the young person if the OHC is not perceived as meaningful support leading towards positive change. The participants have complex, interrelated needs and problems, and they also experience institutional gaps between psychiatric care and social services. It is important to overcome these gaps, so that young people are not located in ‘in-between spaces’ in terms of service provision.
ISSN:0190-7409
1873-7765
DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107395