Evaluation of visual property specification languages based on practical model-checking experience

Formal verification methods like model checking can provide mathematical proofs of design correctness, so their use is justified in applications where safety or reliability requirements are high. A key challenge for the wider adoption of model checking is the effort and expertise needed in formalizing functional requirements into verifiable properties. A particular challenge in specifying formal properties for industrial instrumentation and control (I&C) logics is accounting for the sequencing and timing issues that arise from, e.g., the dynamic behavior of the plant being controlled. In this paper, we evaluate different visual property specification languages that are aimed at making formal methods more accessible. We have collected 3923 formal properties from practical model checking projects in the nuclear and rail traffic industries and identified the most commonly occurring types of properties. Based on the sample data, a real-world example logic, and our practical experience, we identify requirements for a user-friendly property specification language most suited for our specific domain of industrial I&C. •We have collected 3923 formal properties from practical model-checking projects.•A real nuclear I&C example highlights the challenges in property specification.•Proposed visual property specification languages all have different limitations.•There is no silver bullet for making industrial I&C property specification easy.