Effects of losartan and captopril on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after acute myocardial infarction: Results of the Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II antagonist losartan (optimaal) echocardiographic substudy

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to attenuate adverse remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and the same has been suggested for angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in animal models. Therefore the aim of the study was to compare the effects of losartan and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American heart journal 2004-03, Vol.147 (3), p.494-501
Hauptverfasser: Møller, Jacob E, Dahlström, Ulf, Gøtzsche, Ole, Lahiri, Avijit, Skagen, Knud, Andersen, Gert Steen, Egstrup, Kenneth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to attenuate adverse remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and the same has been suggested for angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in animal models. Therefore the aim of the study was to compare the effects of losartan and captopril on regional systolic, diastolic, and overall left ventricular (LV) function after AMI. Two hundred twenty-five patients aged ≥50 years with documented AMI and heart failure and/or LV dysfunction were randomly assigned treatment with either losartan (50 mg/d) or captopril (50 mg 3 times/d). Echocardiography was performed at randomization and after 3 months; echocardiograms were analyzed blinded at the core laboratory. Main outcome measures were changes in wall motion score index (WMSI), E-wave deceleration time (E-DT), and Tei index of overall LV function. WMSI decreased in both groups (losartan 1.58 ± 0.23 to 1.52 ± 0.26, P = .009, captopril 1.60 ± 0.24 to 1.48 ± 0.22, P < .001), although the decrease was greater in patients allocated to captopril (captopril −0.12 ± 0.17 vs losartan −0.05 ± 0.19, P = .007). In both groups E-DT increased, although the increase was significant only in patients treated with captoril (193 ± 61 ms to 208 ± 70 ms, P = .05). The change in E-DT was not different between treatment groups (captopril 14 ± 74 ms vs losartan 7 ± 80 ms, P = .52). Tei index decreased in both groups (losartan 0.59 ± 0.13 to 0.55 ± 0.15, P = .04, captopril 0.62 ± 0.15 to 0.55 ± 0.13, P < .001). However, the reduction was significantly greater in patients treated with captopril (captopril −0.08 ± 0.14 vs losartan −0.03 ± 0.14, P = .01). Losartan and captopril improve systolic and overall LV function after AMI, but the benefit is greater for patients treated with captopril.
ISSN:0002-8703
1097-6744
1097-6744
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.031