Activation of the μ‐opioid receptor by alicyclic fentanyls: Changes from high potency full agonists to low potency partial agonists with increasing alicyclic substructure

Fentanyl analogs represent an important group of new psychoactive substances and knowing their efficacy and potency might assist in interpreting observed concentrations. The potency of fentanyl analogs can be estimated from in vitro studies and can be used to establish structure–activity relationships. In this study, recombinant CHO‐K1 cells (AequoScreen) expressing the human μ‐opioid receptor were used to establish dose–response curves via luminescent analysis for cyclopropyl‐, cyclobutyl‐, cyclopentyl‐, cyclohexyl‐, and 2,2,3,3‐tetramethylcyclopropylfentanyl (TMCPF), on three separate occasions, using eight different concentrations in an eight‐fold serial dilution in triplicates starting at ~60 μM. Fentanyl was used as a full agonist reference while morphine and buprenorphine were included for comparison. Cyclopropylfentanyl (EC50 = 4.3 nM), cyclobutylfentanyl (EC50 = 6.2 nM), and cyclopentylfentanyl (EC50 = 13 nM) were full agonists slightly less potent than fentanyl (EC50 = 1.7 nM). Cyclohexylfentanyl (EC50 = 3.1 μM, efficacy 48%) and TMCPF (EC50 = 1.5 μM, efficacy 65%) were partial agonists less potent than morphine (EC50 = 430 nM). Based on the results, cyclopropyl‐, cyclobutyl‐, and cyclopentylfentanyl would be expected to induce intoxication or cause fatal poisonings at similar concentrations to fentanyl, while the toxic or fatal concentrations of cyclohexylfentanyl and TMCPF would be expected to be much higher. Cyclopropyl‐, cyclobutyl‐ and cyclopentyl‐fentanyl are full agonists with potency similar to fentanyl at the µ‐opioid receptor while Cyclohexyl‐ and 2,2,3,3‐tetramethyl‐cyclopropyl‐fentanyl (TMCPF) are partial agonists with potency lower than buprenorphine using an AequoScreen assay.