Competitive Exclusion and Evolution: Convergence Almost Never Produces Ecologically Equivalent Species

In a recent modeling study (“Limiting Similarity? The Ecological Dynamics of Natural Selection among Resources and Consumers Caused by Both Apparent and Resource Competition”) that appeared in the April 2019 issue of The American Naturalist, Mark A. McPeek argued that ecologically equivalent species...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American naturalist 2020-04, Vol.195 (4), p.E112-E117
Hauptverfasser: Pasztor, Liz, Barabas, Gyorgy, Meszena, Geza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In a recent modeling study (“Limiting Similarity? The Ecological Dynamics of Natural Selection among Resources and Consumers Caused by Both Apparent and Resource Competition”) that appeared in the April 2019 issue of The American Naturalist, Mark A. McPeek argued that ecologically equivalent species may emerge via competition-induced trait convergence, in conflict with naive expectations based on the limiting similarity principle. Although the emphasis on the possibility of the convergence of competitors is very timely, here we show that the proposed mechanism will only lead to actual coexistence in the converged state for specially chosen fine-tuned parameter settings. It is therefore not a robust mechanism for the evolution of ecologically equivalent species. We conclude that invoking trait convergence as an explanation for the co-occurrence of seemingly fully equivalent species in nature would be premature.
ISSN:0003-0147
1537-5323
1537-5323
DOI:10.1086/707610