A Framework for Learning from Adaptive Performance
There is often a difference between the way work is expected to be carried out (work as imagined) and the way it is actually carried out (work as done) in order to cope with complexity in high-risk work (for example, Hoffman and Woods, 2011; Hollnagel, 2012; Loukopoulos, Dismukes and Barshi, 2009)....
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buchkapitel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | There is often a difference between the way work is expected to be
carried out (work as imagined) and the way it is actually carried
out (work as done) in order to cope with complexity in high-risk
work (for example, Hoffman and Woods, 2011; Hollnagel, 2012;
Loukopoulos, Dismukes and Barshi, 2009). Events and demands
do not always fit the preconceived plans and textbook examples,
leaving nurses, air traffic controllers, fire chiefs and control room
operators to ‘fill in the gaps’. Examining practitioners’ work
shows a story of people coping with complexities by continuously
adapting their performance, often dealing successfully with
disturbances and unexpected events. Such stories can provide
important information for organisations to identify system
resilience and brittleness. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1201/9781315605708-14 |