4D flow MRI can detect subtle right ventricular dysfunction in primary left ventricular disease

Purpose To investigate whether 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect subtle right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in primary left ventricular (LV) disease. Materials and Methods 4D flow and morphological 3T MRI data were acquired in 22 patients with mild ischemic heart disease who were st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2016-03, Vol.43 (3), p.558-565
Hauptverfasser: Fredriksson, Alexandru Grigorescu, Svalbring, Emil, Eriksson, Jonatan, Dyverfeldt, Petter, Alehagen, Urban, Engvall, Jan, Ebbers, Tino, Carlhäll, Carl-Johan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To investigate whether 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect subtle right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in primary left ventricular (LV) disease. Materials and Methods 4D flow and morphological 3T MRI data were acquired in 22 patients with mild ischemic heart disease who were stratified into two groups based on LV end‐diastolic volume index (EDVI): lower‐LVEDVI and higher‐LVEDVI, as well as in 11 healthy controls. The RV volume was segmented at end‐diastole (ED) and end‐systole (ES). Pathlines were emitted from the ED volume and traced forwards and backwards in time to ES. The blood volume was separated into flow components. The Direct Flow (DF) component was defined as RV inflow passing directly to outflow. The kinetic energy (KE) of the DF component was calculated. Echocardiographic conventional RV indices were also assessed. Results The higher‐LVEDVI group had larger LVEDVI and lower LV ejection fraction (98 ± 32 ml/m2; 48 ± 13%) compared to the healthy (67 ± 12, P = 0.002; 64 ± 7, P < 0.001) and lower‐LVEDI groups (62 ± 10; 68 ± 7, both P < 0.001). The RV 4D flow‐specific measures “DF/EDV volume‐ratio” and “DF/EDV KE‐ratio at ED” were lower in the higher‐LVEDVI group (38 ± 5%; 52 ± 6%) compared to the healthy (44 ± 6; 65 ± 7, P = 0.018 and P < 0.001) and lower‐LVEDVI groups (44 ± 6; 64 ± 7, P = 0.011 and P < 0.001). There was no difference in any of the conventional MRI and echocardiographic RV indices between the three groups. Conclusion We found that in primary LV disease mild impairment of RV function can be detected by 4D flow‐specific measures, but not by the conventional MRI and echocardiographic indices. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2016;43:558–565.
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.25015