A comparison between hexaaluminates and perovskites for catalytic combustion applications
Hexaaluminates and perovskites are two promising candidates for use in catalytic combustion applications. In the present study two hexaaluminates, LaMnAl 11O 19 and LaCoAl 11O 19, were compared with two perovskites, LaMnO 3 and LaCoO 3, with respect to their thermal stability and catalytic activity...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catalysis today 2006-03, Vol.112 (1), p.157-160 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Hexaaluminates and perovskites are two promising candidates for use in catalytic combustion applications. In the present study two hexaaluminates, LaMnAl
11O
19 and LaCoAl
11O
19, were compared with two perovskites, LaMnO
3 and LaCoO
3, with respect to their thermal stability and catalytic activity for combustion of methane and gasified biomass. The results showed that the hexaaluminates retained a much higher surface area even after calcination at 1200
°C compared to the perovskites. LaMnAl
11O
19 showed the highest catalytic activity of all catalysts. LaCoAl
11O
19 generally showed low activity. Of the two perovskites, LaCoO
3 was the most active, and the initial test run the activity for biomass combustion were close to that one of LaMnAl
11O
19 even though its surface area was only one tenth of the hexaaluminate's. However, it was severely deactivated in the second test run. Similar deactivation but less severe was also found for the other catalyst. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0920-5861 1873-4308 1873-4308 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.11.024 |