Comment on “Ginzburg-Landau theory of two-band superconductors: Absence of type-1.5 superconductivity”

The recent paper by V. G. Kogan and J. Schmalian [Phys. Rev. B 83, 054515 (2011)] argues that the widely used two-component Ginzburg-Landau (GL) models are not correct, and further concludes that in the regime which is described by a GL theory there could be no disparity in the coherence lengths of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics Condensed matter and materials physics, 2012-07, Vol.86 (1), p.016501, Article 016501
Hauptverfasser: Babaev, Egor, Silaev, Mihail
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The recent paper by V. G. Kogan and J. Schmalian [Phys. Rev. B 83, 054515 (2011)] argues that the widely used two-component Ginzburg-Landau (GL) models are not correct, and further concludes that in the regime which is described by a GL theory there could be no disparity in the coherence lengths of two superconducting components. This would in particular imply that [in contrast to U(1) x U(1) superconductors] there could be no "type-1.5" superconducting regime in U(1) multiband systems for any finite interband coupling strength. We point out that these claims are incorrect and based on an erroneous scheme of reduction of a two-component GL theory.
ISSN:1098-0121
1550-235X
1550-235X
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.016501