Evaluation of scale-up from analytical to preparative supercritical fluid chromatography

•A predictable scale up strategy is presented from analytical to preparative level SFC.•Real column conditions must be measured and properly transferred between the units.•Guidelines are given to preserve retention and selectivity throughout the scale-up.•Methanol fraction and pressure are the two m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Chromatography A 2015-12, Vol.1425, p.280-286
Hauptverfasser: Enmark, Martin, Åsberg, Dennis, Leek, Hanna, Öhlén, Kristina, Klarqvist, Magnus, Samuelsson, Jörgen, Fornstedt, Torgny
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A predictable scale up strategy is presented from analytical to preparative level SFC.•Real column conditions must be measured and properly transferred between the units.•Guidelines are given to preserve retention and selectivity throughout the scale-up.•Methanol fraction and pressure are the two most important parameters to control.•Retention volume/factor has a much more complex dependence on flow rate than expected. An approach for reliable transfer from analytical to preparative scale supercritical fluid chromatography was evaluated. Here, we accounted for the conditions inside the columns as well as to the fact that most analytical instruments are volume-controlled while most preparative scale units are mass-controlled. The latter is a particular problem when performing pilot scale experiments and optimizations prior to scaling up to production scale. This was solved by measuring the mass flow, the pressure and the temperature on the analytical unit using external sensors. Thereafter, it was revealed with a design of experiments approach that the methanol fraction and the pressure are the two most important parameters to control for preserved retention throughout the scale-up; for preserved selectivity the temperature was most important in this particular system. Using this approach, the resulting chromatograms from the preparative unit agreed well with those from the analytical unit while keeping the same column length and particles size. A brief investigation on how the solute elution volume varies with the volumetric flow rate revealed a complex dependency on pressure, density and apparent methanol content. Since the methanol content is a parameter of great importance to control during the scale up, we must be careful when changing operational and column design conditions which generates deviations in pressure, density and methanol content between different columns.
ISSN:0021-9673
1873-3778
1873-3778
DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2015.11.001