Assessing test artifact quality—A tertiary study

Modern software development increasingly relies on software testing for an ever more frequent delivery of high quality software. This puts high demands on the quality of the central artifacts in software testing, test suites and test cases. We aim to develop a comprehensive model for capturing the d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Information and software technology 2021-11, Vol.139, p.106620, Article 106620
Hauptverfasser: Tran, Huynh Khanh Vi, Unterkalmsteiner, Michael, Börstler, Jürgen, Ali, Nauman bin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Modern software development increasingly relies on software testing for an ever more frequent delivery of high quality software. This puts high demands on the quality of the central artifacts in software testing, test suites and test cases. We aim to develop a comprehensive model for capturing the dimensions of test case/suite quality, which are relevant for a variety of perspectives. We have carried out a systematic literature review to identify and analyze existing secondary studies on quality aspects of software testing artifacts. We identified 49 relevant secondary studies. Of these 49 studies, less than half did some form of quality appraisal of the included primary studies and only 3 took into account the quality of the primary study when synthesizing the results. We present an aggregation of the context dimensions and factors that can be used to characterize the environment in which the test case/suite quality is investigated. We also provide a comprehensive model of test case/suite quality with definitions for the quality attributes and measurements based on findings in the literature and ISO/IEC 25010:2011. The test artifact quality model presented in the paper can be used to support test artifact quality assessment and improvement initiatives in practice. Furthermore, the model can also be used as a framework for documenting context characteristics to make research results more accessible for research and practice.
ISSN:0950-5849
1873-6025
1873-6025
DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106620