Det norske skyldeie - et særnorsk fænomen?
Land Rent Ownership In Norway - A Peculiarity of the Norwegians?There seems to be a wide-spread conception among Nordic agrarian historians that the right to land property in the form it existed in Norway from the thirteenth to the eighteenth century, namely land-rent ownership (skyldeie), i.e., own...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Historisk tidsskrift (København) 2013-01 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | dan |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Land Rent Ownership In Norway - A Peculiarity of the Norwegians?There seems to be a wide-spread conception among Nordic agrarian historians that the right to land property in the form it existed in Norway from the thirteenth to the eighteenth century, namely land-rent ownership (skyldeie), i.e., ownership of the right to receive rent from landed property rather than ownership of the land as such, was a peculiarly Norwegian phenomenon. An outstanding exponent of this idea was the Norwegian agrarian historian Andreas Holmsen. The author of the present study has nevertheless found a number of examples, especially in Danish sources, that justify a rejection of Holmsen's construction of the property system as uniquely Norwegian. For in Denmark as well, the annual land rent (skylden) of the Late Middle Ages and Early Modern Period functioned as a measure of land ownership in purchase, sale, and not the least, inheritance. The landowner could likewise possess a partial rent right or shares in the farm's rent right, an arrangement that merely entailed a right to a portion of the farm's income, but not the right of physical disposal. Like Norwegian land-rent ownership, the Danish annual land rent was the direct consequence of a predominant property and rent structure in the Late Middle Ages. The ownership of land functioned first and foremost as a source of rents; the landowners at that time rarely conceived of subdividing farms and plots or demanding the use of certain areas of a farm. Moreover, many of the tenant leases were tied into a complicated system of commons, some of them inhibiting the physical division of the farms involved; and in some forms of inheritance the cultivation systems would require a subdivision of rents and shared rent ownership. Furthermore, since the principle of justice was frequently applied in inheritance cases among the nobility, noble families seeking to divide the inheritance of farms with the greatest possible justice to the heirs could resort to a division of the annual land rents. On the other hand, Danish letters from the Late Middle Ages bear witness to the rarity of donating, bequeathing, selling, or panting rent shares to ecclesiastical institutions as well as other kinds of transactions involving rent shares. The Zealand Ecclesiastical Land Record (Sjællands Stifts Landebog) from 1567 shows quite clearly that the kind of donations made by the peasants to the parish churches and the clergy were small single plots, fields, cr |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0106-4991 2597-0666 |