Self-Reported Depressive Symptom Measures: Sensitivity to Detecting Change in a Randomized, Controlled Trial of Chronically Depressed, Nonpsychotic Outpatients: Clinical Research

This study evaluated and compared the performance of three self-report measures: (1) 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (IDS-SR 30 ); (2) 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR 16 ); and (3) Patient Global Impression-Improvement (PGI-I) in a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2005-02, Vol.30 (2), p.405-416
Hauptverfasser: Rush, A John, Trivedi, Madhukar H, Carmody, Thomas J, Ibrahim, Hisham M, Markowitz, John C, Keitner, Gabor I, Kornstein, Susan G, Arnow, Bruce, Klein, Daniel N, Manber, Rachel, Dunner, David L, Gelenberg, Alan J, Kocsis, James H, Nemeroff, Charles B, Fawcett, Jan, Thase, Michael E, Russell, James M, Jody, Darlene N, Borian, Frances E, Keller, Martin B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study evaluated and compared the performance of three self-report measures: (1) 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (IDS-SR 30 ); (2) 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR 16 ); and (3) Patient Global Impression-Improvement (PGI-I) in assessing clinical outcomes in depressed patients during a 12-week, acute phase, randomized, controlled trial comparing nefazodone, cognitive-behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP), and the combination in the treatment of chronic depression. The IDS-SR 30 , QIDS-SR 16 , PGI-I, and the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS 24 ) ratings were collected at baseline and at weeks 1–4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. Response was defined a priori as a ⩾50% reduction in baseline total score for the IDS-SR 30 or for the QIDS-SR 16 or as a PGI-I score of 1 or 2 at exit. Overall response rates (LOCF) to nefazodone were 41% (IDS-SR 30 ), 45% (QIDS-SR 16 ), 53% (PCI-I), and 47% (HDRS 17 ). For CBASP, response rates were 41% (IDS-SR 30 ), 45% (QIDS-SR 16 ), 48% (PGI-I), and 46% (HDRS 17 ). For the combination, response rates were 68% (IDS-SR 30 and QIDS-SR 16 ), 73% (PGI-I), and 76% (HDRS 17 ). Similarly, remission rates were comparable for nefazodone (IDS-SR 30 =32%, QIDS-SR 16 =28%, PGI-I=22%, HDRS 17 =30%), for CBASP (IDS-SR 30 =32%, QIDS-SR 16 =30%, PGI-I=21%, HDRS 17 =32%), and for the combination (IDS-SR 30 =52%, QIDS-SR 16 =50%, PGI-I=25%, HDRS 17 =49%). Both the IDS-SR 30 and QIDS-SR 16 closely mirrored and confirmed findings based on the HDRS 24 . These findings raise the possibility that these two self-reports could provide cost- and time-efficient substitutes for clinician ratings in treatment trials of outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD without cognitive impairment. Global patient ratings such as the PGI-I, as opposed to specific item-based ratings, provide less valid findings.
ISSN:0893-133X
1740-634X
DOI:10.1038/sj.npp.1300614