Adapting two American Decision Aids for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury to the Canadian Context Using the Nominal Group Technique

Background Decision aids are patient-focused tools that have the potential to reduce the overuse of head computed tomography (CT) scans. Objective The objective of this study was to create a consensus among Canadian mild traumatic brain injury and emergency medicine experts on modifications required...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The patient : patient-centered outcomes research 2020-12, Vol.13 (6), p.729-743
Hauptverfasser: Ghandour, El Kebir, Lelaidier Hould, Lania, Fortier, Félix-Antoine, Gélinas, Veronique, Melnick, Edward R., Hess, Erik P., Lang, Eddy S., Gravel, Jocelyn, Perry, Jeffrey J., Le Sage, Natalie, Truchon, Catherine, LeBlanc, Annie, Dubrovsky, Alexander Sasha, Gagnon, Marie-Pierre, Ouellet, Marie-Christine, Gagnon, Isabelle, McKenna, Suzanne, Légaré, France, Sauvé, Louise, van de Belt, Tom H., Kavanagh, Éric, Paquette, Laurence, Verrette, Anne-Catherine, Plante, Patrick, Riopelle, Richard J., Archambault, Patrick M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Decision aids are patient-focused tools that have the potential to reduce the overuse of head computed tomography (CT) scans. Objective The objective of this study was to create a consensus among Canadian mild traumatic brain injury and emergency medicine experts on modifications required to adapt two American decision aids about head CT use for adult and paediatric mild traumatic brain injury to the Canadian context. Methods We invited 21 Canadian stakeholders and the two authors of the American decision aids to a Nominal Group Technique consensus meeting to generate suggestions for adapting the decision aids. This method encourages idea generation and sharing between team members. Each idea was discussed and then prioritised using a voting system. We collected data using videotaping, writing material and online collaborative writing tools. The modifications proposed were analysed using a qualitative thematic content analysis. Results Twenty-one participants took part in the meeting, including researchers and clinician researchers ( n  = 9; 43%), patient partners ( n  = 3; 14%) and decision makers ( n  = 2; 10%). A total of 84 ideas were generated. Participants highlighted the need to clarify the purpose of the decision aids, the nature of the problem being addressed and the target population. The tools require sociocultural adaptations, better identification of their target population, better description of head CT utility, advantages and related risks, modification of the visual and written representation of the risk of brain injury and head CT use, and locally adapted, patient follow-up plans. Conclusions This study based on a Nominal Group Technique identified several adaptations for two American decision aids about head CT use for mild traumatic brain injury to support their use in Canada’s different healthcare, social, cultural and legal context. These adaptations concerned the target users of the decision aids, the information presented, and how the benefits and risks were communicated in the decision aids. Future steps include prototyping the two adapted decision aids, conducting formative evaluations with actual emergency department patients and clinicians, and measuring the impact of the adapted tools on CT scan use. Plain Language Summary A mild traumatic brain injury (also called concussion) can happen when the brain moves around in the skull after an impact to the head. A concussion is not a brain bleed and you cannot see a concuss
ISSN:1178-1653
1178-1661
DOI:10.1007/s40271-020-00459-y