Photobiomodulation effects on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in an orthotopic animal model

Background Photobiomodulation (PBM) has shown efficacy in preventing and treating cancer therapy-induced mucositis and dermatitis. However, there is contradictory information regarding the effect of PBM on (pre)malignant cells, which has led to questions regarding the safety of this technique. We ad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2020-06, Vol.28 (6), p.2721-2727
Hauptverfasser: Barasch, Andrei, Li, Hongyan, Rajasekhar, Vinagolu K., Raber-Durlacher, Judith, Epstein, Joel B., Carroll, James, Haimovitz-Friedman, Adriana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Photobiomodulation (PBM) has shown efficacy in preventing and treating cancer therapy-induced mucositis and dermatitis. However, there is contradictory information regarding the effect of PBM on (pre)malignant cells, which has led to questions regarding the safety of this technique. We address this issue using an orthotopic mouse model (Cal-33) with human squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Methods Mice with actively growing orthotopic Cal-33 head and neck carcinoma tumors were divided into 4 groups: control, PBM only, radiation therapy (RT) only, and PBM + RT. We performed three experiments: (1) PBM at 660 nm, 18.4 J/cm 2 , and 5 RT × 4 Gy doses delivered daily; (2) PBM at 660 nm, 18.4 J/cm 2 , and 1 × 15 Gy RT; and (3) PBM at 660 nm + 850 nm, 45 mW/cm 2 , 3.4 J/cm 2 , and 1 × 15 Gy RT. Mice were weighed daily and tumor volumes were evaluated by IVIS. Survival time was also evaluated. Results Animals treated with RT survived significantly longer and had significantly smaller tumor volume when compared with the control and PBM-only treatment groups. No significant differences were noted between the RT alone and PBM + RT groups in any of the experiments. Conclusion Our results suggest that PBM at the utilized parameters does not provide protection to the tumor from the killing effects of RT.
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-019-05060-0