The Amsterdam Wrist Rules to reduce the need for radiography after a suspected distal radius fracture: an implementation study
Purpose While most patients with wrist trauma are routinely referred for radiography, around 50% of these radiographs show no fracture. To avoid unnecessary radiographs, the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) have previously been developed and validated. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the eff...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) 2020-06, Vol.46 (3), p.573-582 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
While most patients with wrist trauma are routinely referred for radiography, around 50% of these radiographs show no fracture. To avoid unnecessary radiographs, the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) have previously been developed and validated. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of the AWR at the Emergency Department (ED).
Methods
In a before-and-after comparative prospective cohort study, all consecutive adult patients with acute wrist trauma presenting at the ED of four hospitals were included. Primary outcome was the number of wrist radiographs before and after implementation of the AWR. Secondary outcomes were the number of clinically relevant missed fractures, the overall length of stay in the ED, physician compliance regarding the AWR, and patient satisfaction and experience with the care received at the ED.
Results
A total of 402 patients were included. The absolute reduction in wrist radiographs after implementation was 15% (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1863-9933 1863-9941 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00068-019-01194-2 |