Effects of Individual difference and L1 phonology on the identification and discrimination of American English vowels by native Japanese and Korean listeners

Native speakers of Japanese and Korean identified and discriminated American English vowels /i, ɪ, ɛ, æ, ɑ, ʌ/ in four different consonantal contexts. These listeners also perceptually assimilated the American English vowels to their respective L1 vowel categories. In another session, these listener...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2019-10, Vol.146 (4), p.2843-2843
1. Verfasser: Nozawa, Takeshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Native speakers of Japanese and Korean identified and discriminated American English vowels /i, ɪ, ɛ, æ, ɑ, ʌ/ in four different consonantal contexts. These listeners also perceptually assimilated the American English vowels to their respective L1 vowel categories. In another session, these listeners produced /i, ɪ, ɛ, æ, ɑ, ʌ/ in two different conditions. They read aloud words on a list, and they repeated after native speakers' utterances. The results revealed that Korean listeners as well as Japanese listeners rely on durational difference to identify and discriminate /i/ and /ɪ/, but Korean listeners perceptually assimilated /i/ and /ɪ/ as roughly equally good exemplars of Korean high front vowel. Japanese listeners, on the other hand, perceived /ɪ/ as somewhat less ideal exemplar of Japanese high front vowel than /i/. However, those Japanese listeners who were sensitive to spectral differences did not outperform those who were less sensitive. Moreover, Japanese listeners sensitive to the spectral differences often misidentified /ɪ/ for /ɛ/. An MDS analysis revealed that in the identification task, listeners’ L1 phonology exercise a stronger influence than do individual differences, but in discrimination task, individual differences are as strong a factor as listeners’ L1 phonology.
ISSN:0001-4966
1520-8524
DOI:10.1121/1.5136859