Acoustic response of an unexploded ordnance in shallow water, layered, environments: Predictions using hybrid and coupled modeling techniques
Previously, a hybrid, axisymmetric, finite element (FE)—propagation model has shown utility in simulating the response of objects in contact with a flat, undisturbed sand/water interface [Espana et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136, 190-124, (2014)]. Here, we offer a three-way comparison between data, th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2016-10, Vol.140 (4), p.2968-2968 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Previously, a hybrid, axisymmetric, finite element (FE)—propagation model has shown utility in simulating the response of objects in contact with a flat, undisturbed sand/water interface [Espana et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136, 190-124, (2014)]. Here, we offer a three-way comparison between data, the hybrid FE/propagation model and a coupled finite element/boundary element model (Coupled FEBE) for the scattering from a replica of a 100-mm unexploded ordnance (UXO) proud, partially buried and fully buried in a sand sediment for geometries where reflection from and refraction into the sand dominate. This comparison offers a more in-depth analysis of the implications of various approximations of the hybrid model, such as the effect of improper fluid loading on the target surface in the partially buried situation. These results will be contrasted to the more complicated mud-over-sand layered environment of the BAYEX14 experiment. Preliminary model results will be compared to data, giving further insight into the dominant physical mechanisms affecting the UXO’s acoustic response in the more complicated layered environment. [Research sponsored by ONR and SERDP.] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
DOI: | 10.1121/1.4969185 |