Monte Carlo simulations of dose from microCT imaging proceduresin a realistic mouse phantom
The purpose of this work was to calculate radiation dose and its organ distribution in a realistic mouse phantom from micro-computed tomography (microCT) imaging protocols. CT dose was calculated using GATE and a voxelized, realistic phantom. The x-ray photon energy spectra used in simulations were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2005-12, Vol.33 (1), p.216-224 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The purpose of this work was to calculate radiation dose and its organ distribution in a realistic mouse phantom from micro-computed tomography (microCT) imaging protocols. CT dose was calculated using
GATE
and a voxelized, realistic phantom. The x-ray photon energy spectra used in simulations were precalculated with
GATE
and validated against previously published data. The number of photons required per simulated experiments was determined by direct exposure measurements. Simulated experiments were performed for three types of beams and two types of mouse beds. Dose-volume histograms and dose percentiles were calculated for each organ. For a typical microCT screening examination with a reconstruction voxel size of
200
μ
m
, the average whole body dose varied from
80
mGy
(at
80
kVp
) to
160
mGy
(at
50
kVp
), showing a strong dependence on beam hardness. The average dose to the bone marrow is close to the soft tissue average. However, due to dose nonuniformity and higher radiation sensitivity, 5% of the marrow would receive an effective dose about four times higher than the average. If CT is performed longitudinally, a significant radiation dose can be given. The total absorbed radiation dose is a function of milliamperes-second, beam hardness, and desired image quality (resolution, noise and contrast). To reduce dose, it would be advisable to use the hardest beam possible while maintaining an acceptable contrast in the image. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
DOI: | 10.1118/1.2148333 |