Front shockbreaker design simulation on KTM gen 1.0 electric car prototype using software inventor

Comfort in a vehicle is essential, especially in the suspension system. It can obtain these conditions if the maximum load limit value, the safety factor value, and the component’s material properties are known. So every company that produces vehicles or their elements must first have standardizatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Giyanto, Wazdi, Farid, Sujianto, Sukandar, Adrial, Hery
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Comfort in a vehicle is essential, especially in the suspension system. It can obtain these conditions if the maximum load limit value, the safety factor value, and the component’s material properties are known. So every company that produces vehicles or their elements must first have standardization according to the provisions and results of extended analysis. This study aims to determine the modeling and strength of the shock absorber suspension of the KTM Gen-1.0 electric car using the Finite Element Analysis method. The first step begins with collecting data on the Shock Absorber: pitch, length, width, and thickness. Loads analyzed are static and dynamic loads in vehicle weight and payload. Then proceed with 2D and 3D suspension modeling. The type of support modeling used in this study is a fixed constraint model. After the design is generated from AutoCAD and Inventor, the next step is to analyze the von Mises stress, displacement, and safety factor at three load variations, namely 50 kg, 90 kg, and 110 kg. At a loading of 50 kg, the value of von Mises is 673.7 Mpa, displacement is 27.69 mm, and the safety factor is 0.32 ul. At a load of 90 kg, the value of von Mises is 1212 Mpa, removal is 49.83 mm, and the safety factor is 0.18 ul. At a load of 110 kg, the significance of von Mises is 1482 Mpa, displacement is 60.91 mm, and the safety factor is 0.15 ul. Based on the analysis of von Mises, displacement, and safety factors on three different loading variations on the Shock Absorber, it can be concluded that the heavier the load, the greater the stress. Then the simulation results are compared with the theoretical calculations to know the difference.
ISSN:0094-243X
1551-7616
DOI:10.1063/5.0201611