Simulation of ERP project scheduling using CPM and PERT method with promodel: A case studies in food and beverage companies in Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia
Completing the ERP implementation project at the Food and Beverage company in South Jakarta, which was initially scheduled for five months, was delayed from six months. The author’s main objective is to determine the optimal time for the completion of the Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Completing the ERP implementation project at the Food and Beverage company in South Jakarta, which was initially scheduled for five months, was delayed from six months. The author’s main objective is to determine the optimal time for the completion of the Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Project. This final project applies the Critical Path Method and Program Evaluation and Review Technique methods in order to obtain a sequence of project activities, critical activities, network in the Enterprise Resource Planning implementation project, and perform Promodel simulations by the scheduling of both Critical Path Method and Program Evaluation and Review Technique, which are expected to run on a real system later Critical activities in an Enterprise Resource Planning implementation project are eight activities. With the Critical Path Method, the project completion time is 162 days. Meanwhile, with the Program Evaluation and Review Technique, the completion time is 157 days. The probability of achieving the project on time for 157 days is 80.51%. In the Promodel simulation, it is known that the Critical Path Method simulation is obtained Scheduled Time (Day) for 162 days, and the Program Evaluation and Review Technique simulation is obtained for 157 days. As a result, to Be analysis becomes Location with the highest Utilization, with a percentage of 37.04% in the Critical Path Method simulation and 35.03% in the Program Evaluation and Review Technique simulation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
DOI: | 10.1063/5.0122303 |