Flexible, multi-measurement guided wave damage detection under varying temperatures
Temperature compensation in structural health monitoring helps identify damage in a structure by removing data variations due to environmental conditions, such as temperature. Stretch-based methods are one of the most commonly used temperature compensation methods. To account for variations in tempe...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Temperature compensation in structural health monitoring helps identify damage in a structure by removing data variations due to environmental conditions, such as temperature. Stretch-based methods are one of the most commonly used temperature compensation methods. To account for variations in temperature, stretch-based methods optimally stretch signals in time to optimally match a measurement to a baseline. All of the data is then compared with the single baseline to determine the presence of damage. Yet, for these methods to be effective, the measurement and the baseline must satisfy the inherent assumptions of the temperature compensation method. In many scenarios, these assumptions are wrong, the methods generate error, and damage detection fails. To improve damage detection, a multi-measurement damage detection method is introduced. By using each measurement in the dataset as a baseline, error caused by imperfect temperature compensation is reduced. The multi-measurement method increases the detection effectiveness of our damage metric, or damage indicator, over time and reduces the presence of additional peaks caused by temperature that could be mistaken for damage. By using many baselines, the variance of the damage indicator is reduced and the effects from damage are amplified. Notably, the multi-measurement improves damage detection over single-measurement methods. This is demonstrated through an increase in the maximum of our damage signature from 0.55 to 0.95 (where large values, up to a maximum of one, represent a statistically significant change in the data due to damage). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
DOI: | 10.1063/1.5031655 |