Model-based feasibility assessment and evaluation of prostate hyperthermia with a commercial MR-guided endorectal HIFU ablation array

Here, operational modifications to a commercial MR-guided ultrasound phased array designed for prostate ablation (part of ExAblate 2100, InSightec Ltd) are presented for the delivery of protracted mild (40 – 45°C) hyperthermia to large contiguous target volumes in the prostate. This high-intensity focused ultrasound phased array is already in clinical trials for prostate ablation, and can be potentially fast-tracked for clinical hyperthermia treatments. As a part of this preliminary feasibility study, patient-specific numerical simulations were performed using Pennes bioheat model and acoustic field calculations were conducted using the rectangular radiator method for the ExAblate prostate array (2.3 MHz, 2.3×4.0 cm2, ∼1000 channels). Thermal solutions were computed using 3D finite element methods (FEM) implemented using Comsol Multiphysics (Comsol Inc). The patient-specific geometries were created through manual segmentation of anatomical structures from representative patient MRIs and 3D rendering (Mimics 15.01, Materialise) and generation of finite element meshes (3-Matic 7.01, Materialise). Array beamforming was employed and acoustic fields were synthesized (Matlab 2010a, MathWorks) to deliver protracted continuous wave hyperthermia to focal prostate cancer targets identified in the patient-specific models. Constraints on power densities, sonication durations and switching speeds imposed by ExAblate hardware and software were incorporated in the models. Sonication strategies explored during modeling were implemented on the ExAblate prostate array and preliminary experiments were conducted in tissue mimicking phantoms under MR temperature monitoring at 3 T (GE Discovery MR750W). Therapeutic temperatures (40 - 45 °C) could be established conformably in focal cancer volumes in a single prostate quadrant using focused heating patterns and hemi-gland heating was possible using diffused heating patterns (iso-phase or diverging). T>41 °C was calculated in 13–23 cm3 volumes for sonications with planar or diverging beam patterns at 0.9–1.2 W/cm2, in 1.5-4 cm3 volumes for simultaneous multi-point focus beam patterns at 2 – 3.4 W/cm2, and in ∼6.0 cm3 for curvilinear (cylindrical) beam patterns at 0.75 W/cm2. Patient-specific models also revealed that treatable volume sizes may be limited from pubic bone heating, especially if the pubic bone is within 15 mm from the prostate. Parametric studies also showed therapeutic heating was possible within power constraints