Comparison study of finite element and basis set methodsfor finite size scaling
We compare two methods of obtaining critical parameters for a quantum Hamiltonian using a finite size scaling approach. A finite element and basis set method were used in conjunction with the finite size scaling to obtain the critical parameters for the Hulthen potential. The critical parameters obt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of chemical physics 2009-09, Vol.131 (10), p.104105-104105-6 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We compare two methods of obtaining critical parameters for a quantum Hamiltonian using a finite size scaling approach. A finite element and basis set method were used in conjunction with the finite size scaling to obtain the critical parameters for the Hulthen potential. The critical parameters obtained analytically were the coupling constant
λ
c
=
1
2
, the critical exponents for the energy
α
=
2
and for the "correlation length"
ν
=
1
. The extrapolated results for finite size scaling with the basis set method are
λ
c
=
0.499
99
,
α
=
1.9960
, and
ν
=
0.999
10
. The results for the finite element solutions are
λ
c
=
0.501
84
,
α
=
1.999
93
, and
ν
=
1.000
79
for the linear interpolation and
λ
c
=
0.500
00
,
α
=
2.000
11
, and
ν
=
1.000
32
for the Hermite interpolation. The results for each method compare very well with the analytical results obtained for the Hulthen potential. However, the finite element method is easier to implement and may be combined with
ab initio
and density functional theory to obtain quantum critical parameters for more complex systems. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9606 1089-7690 |
DOI: | 10.1063/1.3207909 |