To Obtain a Patent Non-Infringement Opinion, Or Not to Obtain It, That’s the Question
Summary This paper aims at analyzing the risk of whether to acquire a patent non-infringement opinion. After Seagate, there have been many decisions of either district courts or Federal Circuit involving willful infringement. This paper discusses some observations from those decisions. The observati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Iuris Dictio 2017-06 (19), p.27-42 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | por |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary This paper aims at analyzing the risk of whether to acquire a patent non-infringement opinion. After Seagate, there have been many decisions of either district courts or Federal Circuit involving willful infringement. This paper discusses some observations from those decisions. The observations give a basis for thinking of whether to acquire a patent non-infringement opinion. The analysis is presented in view of a potential or accused infringer, Company T. Company T could be accused of direct or indirect infringement. By discussing either Federal Circuit’s or district courts’ cases after Seagate, this paper suggests that though there is no duty to get a patent non-infringement opinion, the best strategy for an accused infringer would still be to have such opinion letter. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2528-7834 |
DOI: | 10.18272/iu.v19i19.898 |