The Ministerial Advisory Committees and 3 years of COVID-19 expertise – is the Department of Health’s model for information-sharing pandemic-ready?
Effective pandemic decision-making depends on scientific expert evidence, transparency about public health policy decision-making, its rationales and the evidence on which it is based. The South African government laudably committed its COVID-19 response to be guided by science and evidence. Yet, th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | SAMJ: South African Medical Journal 2024-08, Vol.114 (8), p.24-28 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Effective pandemic decision-making depends on scientific expert evidence, transparency about public health policy decision-making, its rationales and the evidence on which it is based. The South African government laudably committed its COVID-19 response to be guided by science and evidence. Yet, the expert advice that it received was not always readily made available to the public. This submission analyses the time elapsed between the submission of COVID-19 Ministerial Advisory Committees memoranda to the Minister of Health, and the Department of Health’s subsequent publication of these for the period August 2020 - January 2024. It also summarises the outcomes of the Health Justice Initiative’s access to information legal action against the department on expert advice and government decision-making during the pandemic. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0256-9574 2078-5135 2078-5135 |
DOI: | 10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i8.1943 |