Time-To-Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome and Unit of First Contact in the ERICO Study

To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies evaluating the influence of the unit of the first contact on the frequency and time of pharmacological treatment during an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event. The main objective was to investigate if the unit of first contact influenced the frequen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia 2016-10, Vol.107 (4), p.323-330
Hauptverfasser: Santos, Rafael Caire de Oliveira Dos, Goulart, Alessandra Carvalho, Kisukuri, Alan Loureiro Xavier, Brandão, Rodrigo Martins, Sitnik, Debora, Staniak, Henrique Lane, Bittencourt, Marcio Sommer, Lotufo, Paulo Andrade, Bensenor, Isabela Martins, Santos, Itamar de Souza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; por
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies evaluating the influence of the unit of the first contact on the frequency and time of pharmacological treatment during an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event. The main objective was to investigate if the unit of first contact influenced the frequency and time of aspirin treatment in the Strategy of Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ERICO) study. We analyzed the pharmacological treatment time in 830 ERICO participants - 700 individuals for whom the hospital was the unit of first contact and 130 who initially sought primary care units. We built logistic regression models to study whether the unit of first contact was associated with a treatment time of less than three hours. Individuals who went to primary care units received the first aspirin dose in those units in 75.6% of the cases. The remaining 24.4% received aspirin at the hospital. Despite this finding, individuals from primary care still had aspirin administered within three hours more frequently than those who went to the hospital (76.8% vs 52.6%; p
ISSN:0066-782X
1678-4170
1678-4170
DOI:10.5935/abc.20160138