Examining policy preferences for prostitution regulation among American males: The influence of contextual beliefs

The arguments for criminalizing prostitution surround public concerns-moral order, public health, and safety. For this reason, an understanding of attitudes about the nature and consequences of the practice, particularly among American males, the presumed consumers of sex-related exchanges, is neede...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Criminal justice review (Atlanta, Ga.) Ga.), 2020-12, Vol.45 (4), p.413-429
Hauptverfasser: Mancini, Christina, Pickett, Justin T., Budd, Kristen M., Bontrager, Stephanie, Roe-Sepowitz, Dominique
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The arguments for criminalizing prostitution surround public concerns-moral order, public health, and safety. For this reason, an understanding of attitudes about the nature and consequences of the practice, particularly among American males, the presumed consumers of sex-related exchanges, is needed. Specifically, how do contextual beliefs about the nature of prostitution (e.g., negative health effects, victimization risk, age of entry) shape policy preferences regarding prostitution? Data from a nationally representative survey developed to solicit sensitive information are utilized to assess these attitudes among a large sample of American men ('N' 1/4 2,525). Results show that paradoxically most men approve of legalizing commercial sex exchange, even while believing the practice harms prostitutes by increasing victimization risk and reducing their overall well-being. Multivariate analysis indicates divides in opinion regarding legalization support. Implications are discussed.
ISSN:0734-0168
1556-3839
DOI:10.1177/0734016820906601