Examining policy preferences for prostitution regulation among American males: The influence of contextual beliefs
The arguments for criminalizing prostitution surround public concerns-moral order, public health, and safety. For this reason, an understanding of attitudes about the nature and consequences of the practice, particularly among American males, the presumed consumers of sex-related exchanges, is neede...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Criminal justice review (Atlanta, Ga.) Ga.), 2020-12, Vol.45 (4), p.413-429 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The arguments for criminalizing prostitution surround public concerns-moral order, public health, and safety. For this reason, an understanding of attitudes about the nature and consequences of the practice, particularly among American males, the presumed consumers of sex-related exchanges, is needed. Specifically, how do contextual beliefs about the nature of prostitution (e.g., negative health effects, victimization risk, age of entry) shape policy preferences regarding prostitution? Data from a nationally representative survey developed to solicit sensitive information are utilized to assess these attitudes among a large sample of American men ('N' 1/4 2,525). Results show that paradoxically most men approve of legalizing commercial sex exchange, even while believing the practice harms prostitutes by increasing victimization risk and reducing their overall well-being. Multivariate analysis indicates divides in opinion regarding legalization support. Implications are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0734-0168 1556-3839 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0734016820906601 |