Comparison between a newly developed PC-based Doppler umbilical artery waveform analyser and a commercial unit : original article
Objectives. To determine the accuracy of the resistance index (RI) of flow velocity waveforms of the umbilical artery measured using a newly developed PC-based continuous wave Doppler device (Umbiflow) with regard to systematic and random variations when compared with a commercial standard (Vasoflow...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | South African medical journal 2005-01, Vol.95 (1), p.62-64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 64 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 62 |
container_title | South African medical journal |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Bunn, A.E. Theron, G.B. Odendaal, H.J. Theron, A.M. |
description | Objectives. To determine the accuracy of the resistance index (RI) of flow velocity waveforms of the umbilical artery measured using a newly developed PC-based continuous wave Doppler device (Umbiflow) with regard to systematic and random variations when compared with a commercial standard (Vasoflow). Design. A cohort study. Setting. The fetal evaluation clinic (FEC) at Tygerberg Hospital. Subjects. Patients referred to the FEC at Tygerberg Hospital with suspected chronic placental insufficiency. Outcome measures. The correlation coefficients indicating the strength of the relationship between the two devices and their agreement using the method of Bland and Altman. Results. A total of 248 patients were studied. The mean RIs of the first Doppler assessment were 0.69 (standard deviation (SD) 0.11) and 0.67 (SD 0.11) using the Vasoflow and Umbiflow respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient comparing the RI of the first test was 0.85. The degree of agreement between the two methods was excellent, the mean differences being very small (Conclusions. The accuracy of the Umbiflow has been proved. A non-significant trend towards slightly lower values needs to be considered. This could be addressed by changing the percentile cut-off to slightly lower values. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sabinet_JRA</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC68320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>10520/EJC68320</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>10520/EJC68320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC683203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMtqwzAQRUVoIO7jH2aRrUGxK-exdVNKV110b0b2JEzRC8mO8bJ_XkH7AV3dc-HcuxJFJfeHUu1qdScKWammPKr980bcp_Qlc1fHphDfrbcBIyfvQNM4EzlAcDSbBQa6kfGBBvhoS40pw4sPwVCEyWo23KMBjCPFBWa80cVHC-jQLCkr6Ib81HtrKfaczcnxCCfwka_sfpfcG3oU6wuaRE9_-SC2r-fP9q1MqNnR2CWkMOluJ1Ulu_N72xzqStb_1H4AX9BRzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between a newly developed PC-based Doppler umbilical artery waveform analyser and a commercial unit : original article</title><source>Sabinet Open Access Journals</source><creator>Bunn, A.E. ; Theron, G.B. ; Odendaal, H.J. ; Theron, A.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bunn, A.E. ; Theron, G.B. ; Odendaal, H.J. ; Theron, A.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. To determine the accuracy of the resistance index (RI) of flow velocity waveforms of the umbilical artery measured using a newly developed PC-based continuous wave Doppler device (Umbiflow) with regard to systematic and random variations when compared with a commercial standard (Vasoflow). Design. A cohort study. Setting. The fetal evaluation clinic (FEC) at Tygerberg Hospital. Subjects. Patients referred to the FEC at Tygerberg Hospital with suspected chronic placental insufficiency. Outcome measures. The correlation coefficients indicating the strength of the relationship between the two devices and their agreement using the method of Bland and Altman. Results. A total of 248 patients were studied. The mean RIs of the first Doppler assessment were 0.69 (standard deviation (SD) 0.11) and 0.67 (SD 0.11) using the Vasoflow and Umbiflow respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient comparing the RI of the first test was 0.85. The degree of agreement between the two methods was excellent, the mean differences being very small (Conclusions. The accuracy of the Umbiflow has been proved. A non-significant trend towards slightly lower values needs to be considered. This could be addressed by changing the percentile cut-off to slightly lower values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0256-9574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2078-5135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Health and Medical Publishing Group (HMPG)</publisher><subject>Comparative studies ; Flowvelocity waveforms ; Resistance index ; Umbiflow ; Umbilical artery ; Vasoflow</subject><ispartof>South African medical journal, 2005-01, Vol.95 (1), p.62-64</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,39219</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC68320$$EView_record_in_Sabinet_Online_Ltd.$$FView_record_in_$$GSabinet_Online_Ltd.</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bunn, A.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theron, G.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odendaal, H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theron, A.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between a newly developed PC-based Doppler umbilical artery waveform analyser and a commercial unit : original article</title><title>South African medical journal</title><description>Objectives. To determine the accuracy of the resistance index (RI) of flow velocity waveforms of the umbilical artery measured using a newly developed PC-based continuous wave Doppler device (Umbiflow) with regard to systematic and random variations when compared with a commercial standard (Vasoflow). Design. A cohort study. Setting. The fetal evaluation clinic (FEC) at Tygerberg Hospital. Subjects. Patients referred to the FEC at Tygerberg Hospital with suspected chronic placental insufficiency. Outcome measures. The correlation coefficients indicating the strength of the relationship between the two devices and their agreement using the method of Bland and Altman. Results. A total of 248 patients were studied. The mean RIs of the first Doppler assessment were 0.69 (standard deviation (SD) 0.11) and 0.67 (SD 0.11) using the Vasoflow and Umbiflow respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient comparing the RI of the first test was 0.85. The degree of agreement between the two methods was excellent, the mean differences being very small (Conclusions. The accuracy of the Umbiflow has been proved. A non-significant trend towards slightly lower values needs to be considered. This could be addressed by changing the percentile cut-off to slightly lower values.</description><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Flowvelocity waveforms</subject><subject>Resistance index</subject><subject>Umbiflow</subject><subject>Umbilical artery</subject><subject>Vasoflow</subject><issn>0256-9574</issn><issn>2078-5135</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNjMtqwzAQRUVoIO7jH2aRrUGxK-exdVNKV110b0b2JEzRC8mO8bJ_XkH7AV3dc-HcuxJFJfeHUu1qdScKWammPKr980bcp_Qlc1fHphDfrbcBIyfvQNM4EzlAcDSbBQa6kfGBBvhoS40pw4sPwVCEyWo23KMBjCPFBWa80cVHC-jQLCkr6Ib81HtrKfaczcnxCCfwka_sfpfcG3oU6wuaRE9_-SC2r-fP9q1MqNnR2CWkMOluJ1Ulu_N72xzqStb_1H4AX9BRzg</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Bunn, A.E.</creator><creator>Theron, G.B.</creator><creator>Odendaal, H.J.</creator><creator>Theron, A.M.</creator><general>Health and Medical Publishing Group (HMPG)</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Comparison between a newly developed PC-based Doppler umbilical artery waveform analyser and a commercial unit : original article</title><author>Bunn, A.E. ; Theron, G.B. ; Odendaal, H.J. ; Theron, A.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC683203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Flowvelocity waveforms</topic><topic>Resistance index</topic><topic>Umbiflow</topic><topic>Umbilical artery</topic><topic>Vasoflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bunn, A.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theron, G.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odendaal, H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theron, A.M.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>South African medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bunn, A.E.</au><au>Theron, G.B.</au><au>Odendaal, H.J.</au><au>Theron, A.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between a newly developed PC-based Doppler umbilical artery waveform analyser and a commercial unit : original article</atitle><jtitle>South African medical journal</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>62-64</pages><issn>0256-9574</issn><eissn>2078-5135</eissn><abstract>Objectives. To determine the accuracy of the resistance index (RI) of flow velocity waveforms of the umbilical artery measured using a newly developed PC-based continuous wave Doppler device (Umbiflow) with regard to systematic and random variations when compared with a commercial standard (Vasoflow). Design. A cohort study. Setting. The fetal evaluation clinic (FEC) at Tygerberg Hospital. Subjects. Patients referred to the FEC at Tygerberg Hospital with suspected chronic placental insufficiency. Outcome measures. The correlation coefficients indicating the strength of the relationship between the two devices and their agreement using the method of Bland and Altman. Results. A total of 248 patients were studied. The mean RIs of the first Doppler assessment were 0.69 (standard deviation (SD) 0.11) and 0.67 (SD 0.11) using the Vasoflow and Umbiflow respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient comparing the RI of the first test was 0.85. The degree of agreement between the two methods was excellent, the mean differences being very small (Conclusions. The accuracy of the Umbiflow has been proved. A non-significant trend towards slightly lower values needs to be considered. This could be addressed by changing the percentile cut-off to slightly lower values.</abstract><pub>Health and Medical Publishing Group (HMPG)</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0256-9574 |
ispartof | South African medical journal, 2005-01, Vol.95 (1), p.62-64 |
issn | 0256-9574 2078-5135 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC68320 |
source | Sabinet Open Access Journals |
subjects | Comparative studies Flowvelocity waveforms Resistance index Umbiflow Umbilical artery Vasoflow |
title | Comparison between a newly developed PC-based Doppler umbilical artery waveform analyser and a commercial unit : original article |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A38%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sabinet_JRA&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20a%20newly%20developed%20PC-based%20Doppler%20umbilical%20artery%20waveform%20analyser%20and%20a%20commercial%20unit%20:%20original%20article&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Bunn,%20A.E.&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=62-64&rft.issn=0256-9574&rft.eissn=2078-5135&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Csabinet_JRA%3E10520/EJC68320%3C/sabinet_JRA%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sabinet_id=10520/EJC68320&rfr_iscdi=true |