Comparison between a newly developed PC-based Doppler umbilical artery waveform analyser and a commercial unit : original article

Objectives. To determine the accuracy of the resistance index (RI) of flow velocity waveforms of the umbilical artery measured using a newly developed PC-based continuous wave Doppler device (Umbiflow) with regard to systematic and random variations when compared with a commercial standard (Vasoflow...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:South African medical journal 2005-01, Vol.95 (1), p.62-64
Hauptverfasser: Bunn, A.E., Theron, G.B., Odendaal, H.J., Theron, A.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives. To determine the accuracy of the resistance index (RI) of flow velocity waveforms of the umbilical artery measured using a newly developed PC-based continuous wave Doppler device (Umbiflow) with regard to systematic and random variations when compared with a commercial standard (Vasoflow). Design. A cohort study. Setting. The fetal evaluation clinic (FEC) at Tygerberg Hospital. Subjects. Patients referred to the FEC at Tygerberg Hospital with suspected chronic placental insufficiency. Outcome measures. The correlation coefficients indicating the strength of the relationship between the two devices and their agreement using the method of Bland and Altman. Results. A total of 248 patients were studied. The mean RIs of the first Doppler assessment were 0.69 (standard deviation (SD) 0.11) and 0.67 (SD 0.11) using the Vasoflow and Umbiflow respectively. The Pearson's correlation coefficient comparing the RI of the first test was 0.85. The degree of agreement between the two methods was excellent, the mean differences being very small (Conclusions. The accuracy of the Umbiflow has been proved. A non-significant trend towards slightly lower values needs to be considered. This could be addressed by changing the percentile cut-off to slightly lower values.
ISSN:0256-9574
2078-5135