Sub 20 cm computational prediction of the CH bond energy - a case of systematic error in computational thermochemistry
The bond dissociation energy of methylidyne, D 0 (CH), is studied using an improved version of the High-Accuracy Extrapolated ab initio Thermochemistry (HEAT) approach as well as the Feller-Peterson-Dixon (FPD) model chemistry. These calculations, which include basis sets up to nonuple (aug-cc-pCV9Z...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP 2023-08, Vol.25 (32), p.21162-21172 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The bond dissociation energy of methylidyne,
D
0
(CH), is studied using an improved version of the High-Accuracy Extrapolated
ab initio
Thermochemistry (HEAT) approach as well as the Feller-Peterson-Dixon (FPD) model chemistry. These calculations, which include basis sets up to nonuple (aug-cc-pCV9Z) quality, are expected to be capable of providing results substantially more accurate than the
ca.
1 kJ mol
−1
level that is characteristic of standard high-accuracy protocols for computational thermochemistry. The calculated 0 K CH bond energy (27 954 ± 15 cm
−1
for HEAT and 27 956 ± 15 cm
−1
for FPD), along with equivalent treatments of the CH ionization energy and the CH
+
dissociation energy (85 829 ± 15 cm
−1
and 32 946 ± 15 cm
−1
, respectively), were compared to the existing benchmarks from Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT), uncovering an unexpected difference for
D
0
(CH). This has prompted a detailed reexamination of the provenance of the corresponding ATcT benchmark, allowing the discovery and subsequent correction of a systematic error present in several published high-level calculations, ultimately yielding an amended ATcT benchmark for
D
0
(CH). Finally, the current theoretical results were added to the ATcT Thermochemical Network, producing refined ATcT estimates of 27 957.3 ± 6.0 cm
−1
for
D
0
(CH), 32 946.7 ± 0.6 cm
−1
for
D
0
(CH
+
), and 85 831.0 ± 6.0 cm
−1
for IE(CH).
Benchmarking state-of-the-art computations of
D
0
(CH) with Active Thermochemical Tables reveals a systematic error in prior high-level computations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1463-9076 1463-9084 |
DOI: | 10.1039/d2cp03964h |