Can two-step ablation combined with chemotherapeutic liposomes achieve better outcome than traditional RF ablation? A solid tumor animal study
Objectives : To determine whether two-step ablation using sequential low and high temperature heating can achieve improved outcomes in animal tumor models when combined with chemotherapeutic liposomes (LP). Materials and methods : Balb/c mice bearing 4T1 tumor received paclitaxel-loaded liposomes fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nanoscale 2022-05, Vol.14 (17), p.6312-6322 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
: To determine whether two-step ablation using sequential low and high temperature heating can achieve improved outcomes in animal tumor models when combined with chemotherapeutic liposomes (LP).
Materials and methods
: Balb/c mice bearing 4T1 tumor received paclitaxel-loaded liposomes followed 24 h later by either traditional RFA (70 °C, 5 min) or a low temperature RFA (45 °C, 5 min), or two-step RFA (45 °C 2 min + 70 °C 3 min). Intratumoral drug accumulation and bio-distribution in major organs were evaluated. Periablational drug penetration was evaluated by pathologic staining and the intratumoral interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) was measured directly. For long-term outcomes, mice bearing 4T1 or H22 tumors were randomized into five groups (
n
= 8 per group): control (no treatment), RFA alone, LP + RFA (45 °C), LP + RFA (70 °C) and LP + RFA (45 + 70 °C). End-point survivals were compared among the different groups.
Results
: The greater intratumoral drug accumulation (3.35 ± 0.32
vs.
3.79 ± 0.29 × 10
8
phot/cm
2
/s at 24 h,
p
= 0.09), deeper periablational drug penetration (45.7 ± 5.0
vs.
1.6 ± 0.5,
p
< 0.001), and reduced off-target drug deposition in major organs (liver 96.1 ± 31.6
vs.
47.4 ± 1.5 × 10
6
phot/cm
2
/s,
p
< 0.001) were found when combined with RFA (45 °C) compared to drug alone. For long-term outcomes, 4T1 tumor growth rates for LP + two-step RFA (45 + 70 °C) were significantly slower than those of LP + RFA (70 °C), LP + RFA (45 °C), and RFA alone (
P
< 0.01 for all comparisons). End point survival for LP + RFA (45 + 70 °C) was also longer than that for LP + RFA (70 °C) (median 16
vs.
10 days,
p
= 0.003) or LP + RFA 45 °C (11 days,
p
= 0.009) and RFA alone (8.3 days,
p
< 0.001) in 4T1 tumor models. The intratumoral IFP after RFA (45 °C) was significantly lower than baseline RFA (3.3 ± 0.8
vs.
19.2 ± 3.1 mmHg,
p
< 0.001), but was not measurable after RFA (70 °C).
Conclusions
: A two-step ablation combined with chemotherapeutic liposomes can achieve better survival benefit compared to traditional RFA in animal models.
To determine whether two-step ablation using sequential low and high temperature heating can achieve improved outcomes in animal tumor models when combined with chemotherapeutic liposomes (LP). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2040-3364 2040-3372 |
DOI: | 10.1039/d1nr08125j |