The formulation of chemical potentials and free energy changes in biochemical reactions

In 1994, an IUBMB-IUPAC joint committee recommended a revised formulation for standard chemical potentials and reaction free energies motivated by the fact that, in biochemistry, the reactants and products often exist in multiple charge states depending on the pH and pMg of the solution environment. The recommendation involved both the use of (1) a mathematical transform with the intent to hold the pH constant, and (2) the formulation of reference chemical potentials of ionized isomeric species based on the log sum of the individual standard chemical potentials of each isomeric species. Recently, several reports including a 2020 IUPAC report have appeared that challenged the need for such summary formulations, arguing that the standard chemical potentials were sufficient with full accounting of each of the different charge state isomers involved in a biochemical reaction. This work critically evaluates both the use of thermodynamic transforms and the different chemical potential formulations. It is shown that (1) transforms are not necessary to hold the pH constant and (2) demonstrates that the two chemical potential formulations are not equivalent. Which formulation is appropriate depends on what species are measured experimentally or whether an assumption of equilibrium among the charge state isomers is reasonable and desirable. Critical evaluations of IUPAC recommendations for (1) pH transforms and (2) the 1994 Alberty and recent BBR methods for calculating reaction free energies shows that pH transforms are unnecessary and the two reaction free energies are not the same.