Photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide into methanol in reverse fuel cells with tungsten oxide and layered double hydroxide photocatalysts for solar fuel generationElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c3cy00959a

The phenomena of the photocatalytic oxidation of water and photocatalytic reduction of CO 2 were combined using reverse photofuel cells, in which the two photocatalysts, WO 3 and layered double hydroxide (LDH), were separated by a polymer electrolyte (PE) film. WO 3 was used for the photooxidation o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Morikawa, Motoharu, Ogura, Yuta, Ahmed, Naveed, Kawamura, Shogo, Mikami, Gaku, Okamoto, Seiji, Izumi, Yasuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The phenomena of the photocatalytic oxidation of water and photocatalytic reduction of CO 2 were combined using reverse photofuel cells, in which the two photocatalysts, WO 3 and layered double hydroxide (LDH), were separated by a polymer electrolyte (PE) film. WO 3 was used for the photooxidation of water, whereas LDH, comprising Zn, Cu, and Ga, was used for the photoreduction of CO 2 . For this process, photocatalysts pressed on both sides of the PE film were irradiated with UV-visible light through quartz windows and through the space in carbon electrode plates and water-repellent carbon paper for both gas flow and light transmission. 45% of the photocatalyst area was irradiated through the windows. The protons and electrons, which were formed on WO 3 under the flow of helium and moisture, transferred to the LDH via the PE and external circuit, respectively. Methanol was the major product from the LDH under the flow of CO 2 and helium. The observed photoreduction rates of CO 2 to methanol accounted for 68%-100% of photocurrents. This supports the effectiveness of the combined photooxidation and photoreduction mechanism as a viable strategy to selectively produce methanol. In addition, we tested reverse photofuel cell-2, which consisted of a WO 3 film pressed on C paper and LDH film pressed on Cu foil. The photoelectrodes were immersed in acidic solutions of pH 4, with the PE film distinguishing the two compartments. Both the photoelectrodes were completely irradiated by UV-visible light through the quartz windows. Consequently, the photocurrent from the LDH under CO 2 flow to WO 3 under N 2 flow was increased by 2.4-3.4 times in comparison to photofuel cell-1 tested under similar conditions. However, the major product from the LDH was H 2 rather than methanol using photofuel cell-2. The photogenerated electrons in the irradiated area of the photocatalysts were obliged to diffuse laterally to the unirradiated area of photocatalysts in contact with the C papers in photofuel cell-1. This lateral diffusion reduced the photocatalytic conversion rates of CO 2 , despite the advantages of photofuel cell-1 in terms of selective formation and easy separation of gas-phase methanol. Photofuel cells comprising WO 3 and layered double hydroxide converted gaseous CO 2 into methanol whereas hydrogen was formed in the aqueous phase.
ISSN:2044-4753
2044-4761
DOI:10.1039/c3cy00959a