Quantitative understanding of thermal stability of α′′-Fe16N2Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Details of experiments; XRD patterns of the pristine α′′-Fe16N2 nanoparticles and an empty borosilicate capillary (Fig. S1); typical examples of the Rietveld analyses (Fig. S2); XRD patterns of the samples heat-treated at 473, 493, 503 and 513 K under N2 (Fig. S3); plots of wFe, wFe4N, and wamorvs. t/t1/2 (Fig. S4); experimental data collected under an Ar atmosphere (Fig. S5 and S6)

The thermal stability of α′′-Fe 16 N 2 , which attracts much interest because of its superior magnetic properties featuring a large magnetocrystalline anisotropy ( K u ∼ 1 × 10 7 erg cm −3 ) and a large saturation magnetization ( M s ∼ 234 emu g −1 ), though unfortunately thermally unstable, has bee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Yamamoto, Shinpei, Gallage, Ruwan, Ogata, Yasunobu, Kusano, Yoshihiro, Kobayashi, Naoya, Ogawa, Tomoyuki, Hayashi, Naoaki, Kohara, Kaori, Takahashi, Migaku, Takano, Mikio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The thermal stability of α′′-Fe 16 N 2 , which attracts much interest because of its superior magnetic properties featuring a large magnetocrystalline anisotropy ( K u ∼ 1 × 10 7 erg cm −3 ) and a large saturation magnetization ( M s ∼ 234 emu g −1 ), though unfortunately thermally unstable, has been quantitatively studied. The thermal stability of α′′-Fe 16 N 2 , which has a large magnetocrystalline anisotropy ( K u ∼ 1 × 10 7 erg cm −3 ) and a large saturation magnetization ( M s ∼ 234 emu g −1 ), though unfortunately thermally unstable, has been quantitatively studied.
ISSN:1359-7345
1364-548X
DOI:10.1039/c3cc43590c