On the fixation probability of superstars

The Moran process models the spread of genetic mutations through populations. A mutant with relative fitness r is introduced and the system evolves, either reaching fixation (an all-mutant population) or extinction (no mutants). In a widely cited paper, Lieberman et al. (2005 Evolutionary dynamics o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2013-08, Vol.469 (2156), p.20130193-20130193
Hauptverfasser: Díaz, Josep, Goldberg, Leslie Ann, Mertzios, George B., Richerby, David, Serna, Maria, Spirakis, Paul G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Moran process models the spread of genetic mutations through populations. A mutant with relative fitness r is introduced and the system evolves, either reaching fixation (an all-mutant population) or extinction (no mutants). In a widely cited paper, Lieberman et al. (2005 Evolutionary dynamics on graphs. Nature 433, 312-316) generalize the model to populations on the vertices of graphs. They describe a class of graphs ('superstars'), with a parameter k and state that the fixation probability tends to 1−r−k as the graphs get larger: we show that this is untrue as stated. Specifically, for k=5, we show that the fixation probability (in the limit, as graphs get larger) cannot exceed 1−1/j(r), where j(r)=Θ(r4), contrary to the claimed result. Our proof is fully rigorous, though we use a computer algebra package to invert a 31×31 symbolic matrix. We do believe the qualitative claim of Lieberman et al.-that superstar fixation probability tends to 1 as k increases-and that it can probably be proved similarly to their sketch. We were able to run larger simulations than the ones they presented. Simulations on graphs of around 40 000 vertices do not support their claim but these graphs might be too small to exhibit the limiting behaviour.
ISSN:1364-5021
1471-2946
DOI:10.1098/rspa.2013.0193