Change in glottic view during intubation using a KoMAC videolaryngoscope: A retrospective analysis

Intubation with videolaryngoscopy has become popular in various clinical settings. However, despite the use of a videolaryngoscope, difficult intubation still exists and intubation failure has been reported. This retrospective study assessed the efficacy of the 2 maneuvers in improving the glottic v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2023-03, Vol.102 (9), p.e33179-e33179
Hauptverfasser: Shin, Hyun-Jung, Kim, Hyeong Geun, Park, In-Sun, Nam, Sun Woo, Park, Jin-Hyoung, Hwang, Jung-Won, Na, Hyo-Seok
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Intubation with videolaryngoscopy has become popular in various clinical settings. However, despite the use of a videolaryngoscope, difficult intubation still exists and intubation failure has been reported. This retrospective study assessed the efficacy of the 2 maneuvers in improving the glottic view during videolaryngoscopic intubation. The medical records of patients who underwent videolaryngoscopic intubation and whose glottal images were stored in electronic medical charts were reviewed. The videolaryngoscopic images were divided into 3 categories according to the applied optimization techniques as followsconventional method, with the blade tip located in the vallecular; backward-upward-rightward pressure (BURP) maneuver; and epiglottis lifting maneuver. Four independent anesthesiologists scored the visualization of the vocal folds using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO, 0–100%) scoring system. A total of 128 patients with 3 laryngeal images were analyzed. The glottic view was the most improved in the epiglottis lifting maneuver among all the techniques. The median POGO scores were 11.3, 36.9, and 63.1 in the conventional method, BURP, and epiglottis lifting maneuver, respectively ( P  
ISSN:0025-7974
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000033179