Circulating HPV16 DNA in Blood Plasma as Prognosticator and Early Indicator of Cancer Recurrence in Radio-Chemotherapy for Anal Cancer

Implementation of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) treatment modifications requires reliable patient risk stratification. The circulating tumor-related human papillomavirus type 16 (ctHPV16) may play a role in predicting survival or assessing treatment response. The study included 62 ASCC patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancers 2023-01, Vol.15 (3), p.867
Hauptverfasser: Mazurek, Agnieszka M, Małusecka, Ewa, Jabłońska, Iwona, Vydra, Natalia, Rutkowski, Tomasz W, Giglok, Monika, Suwiński, Rafał
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Implementation of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) treatment modifications requires reliable patient risk stratification. The circulating tumor-related human papillomavirus type 16 (ctHPV16) may play a role in predicting survival or assessing treatment response. The study included 62 ASCC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. A threshold of 2.5 was used to determine the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). The ctHPV16 viral load (VL) was quantified by qPCR. In the multivariate Cox analysis, lower SUVmax ( = 0.047) and ctHPV16-positive ( = 0.054) proved to be independent prognostic factors for favorable overall survival (OS). In the subgroup with the higher SUVmax, ctHPV16 and nodal (N) status were independent prognostic factors with = 0.022 for ctHPV16 and = 0.053 for N. The best survival rate (95%) presented ctHPV16-positive/N-negative patients. High ctHPV16 VL tended to be slightly specific for patients younger than 63 years ( = 0.152). The decrease in ctHPV16 VL to undetectable level after the end of treatment correlated with the overall clinical response. A prognostic stratification by SUVmax, ctHPV16 and N-positive status allows consideration of more aggressive treatment in high-risk patients (those with high SUVmax, ctHPV16-negative, and N-positive) or de-intensification of therapy in low-risk patients (those with low SUVmax, ctHPV16-positive and N-negative). However, prospective clinical trials on a large group are needed.
ISSN:2072-6694
2072-6694
DOI:10.3390/cancers15030867