Risk of COVID-19 infection in long-term survivors of blood or marrow transplantation: a BMTSS report

•COVID-19 infection risk is similar for long-term BMT survivors and non-BMT participants.•Among BMT survivors, COVID-19 infection risk is higher among those who are unemployed and not masking. [Display omitted] There is limited information regarding COVID-19 in long-term blood or marrow transplant (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood advances 2023-06, Vol.7 (12), p.2843-2854
Hauptverfasser: Johnston, Emily E., Meng, Qingrui, Hageman, Lindsey, Wu, Jessica, Ross, Elizabeth, Lim, Shawn, Balas, Nora, Bosworth, Alysia, Te, Hok Sreng, Francisco, Liton, Bhatia, Ravi, Forman, Stephen J., Wong, F. Lennie, Armenian, Saro H., Weisdorf, Daniel J., Landier, Wendy, Bhatia, Smita
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•COVID-19 infection risk is similar for long-term BMT survivors and non-BMT participants.•Among BMT survivors, COVID-19 infection risk is higher among those who are unemployed and not masking. [Display omitted] There is limited information regarding COVID-19 in long-term blood or marrow transplant (BMT) survivors. We leveraged the BMT Survivor Study (BMTSS) to address this gap. BMTSS included patients who underwent BMT at 1 of 3 sites in the United States between 1974 and 2014 and survived ≥2 years after BMT. A sibling cohort serves as a non-BMT comparison group. Participants (2430 BMT survivors; 780 non-BMT participants) completed the BMTSS survey between October 2020 and November 2021 about COVID-19 testing, risk mitigation behaviors, morbidity, and health care use. Median age at BMT was 46 years (range, 0-78 years) and median follow-up since BMT was 14 years (6-46 years); 76% were non-Hispanic White, 54% had received allogeneic BMT. The risk of COVID-19 infection was comparable for BMT survivors vs non-BMT participants (15-month cumulative incidence, 6.5% vs 8.1%; adjusted odd ratio [aOR] = 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.33; P = .68). Among survivors, being unemployed (aOR 1.90; 95% CI, 1.12-3.23; P = .02; reference: retired) increased the odds of infection; always wearing a mask in public was protective (aOR = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002; reference: not always masking). When compared with COVID-positive non-BMT participants, COVID-positive BMT survivors had higher odds of hospitalization (aOR = 2.23; 95% CI, 0.99-5.05; P = .05); however, the odds of emergency department visits were comparable (aOR = 1.60; 95% CI = 0.71-3.58; P = .25). COVID-19 infection status did not increase the odds of hospitalization among BMT survivors (aOR = 1.32; 95% CI = 0.89-1.95; P = .17) but did increase the odds of emergency department visits (aOR = 2.63; 95% CI, 1.74-3.98; P
ISSN:2473-9529
2473-9537
DOI:10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009550