Discrepancies in Thyroidectomy Outcomes Between General Surgeons and Otolaryngologists

Thyroidectomy is a common operation, performed by general surgeons and otolaryngologists. Few studies compare complication rates between these two specialties. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications including recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of otolaryngology, and head, and neck surgery and head, and neck surgery, 2022-12, Vol.74 (Suppl 3), p.5384-5390
Hauptverfasser: Stopenski, Stephen, Grigorian, Areg, Roditi, Rachel, Jutric, Zeljka, Yamamoto, Maki, Lekawa, Michael, Nahmias, Jeffry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Thyroidectomy is a common operation, performed by general surgeons and otolaryngologists. Few studies compare complication rates between these two specialties. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications including recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury, hypocalcemia, or hematoma based on the surgical specialty performing the thyroidectomy. The 2016–2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Targeted Thyroidectomy database was queried for patients who underwent thyroidectomy for both benign and malignant thyroid diseases. Thyroidectomies performed by general surgeons were compared to those performed by otolaryngologists. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with RLN injury, hematoma, and hypocalcemia. From 11,595 patients, 6313 (54.4%) were performed by general surgeons and 5282 (45.6%) by otolaryngologists. Goiter (43.7%) and nodule/neoplasm (40.8%) were the most common indications for the general surgery and otolaryngology cohorts respectively. General surgeons used an energy vessel sealant device more frequently (77.7% vs. 51.5%, p  
ISSN:2231-3796
0973-7707
DOI:10.1007/s12070-021-02650-5