Comparison of Outcomes of Open Mastoid Cavity- with or Without Obliteration

For a chronically discharging ear open mastoidectomy is the mainstay of treatment, however it can cause high morbidity due a large cavity and complications like discharge, vertigo and difficulty with hearing aids. To avoid such problem, obliteration of mastoid cavity is done. The objective of our st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of otolaryngology, and head, and neck surgery and head, and neck surgery, 2022-12, Vol.74 (Suppl 3), p.4341-4344
Hauptverfasser: Bhardwaj, Heemani, Amin, Saddaf, Bhardwaj, Yavan, Mahmood, Tariq, Raj, Dev
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:For a chronically discharging ear open mastoidectomy is the mainstay of treatment, however it can cause high morbidity due a large cavity and complications like discharge, vertigo and difficulty with hearing aids. To avoid such problem, obliteration of mastoid cavity is done. The objective of our study was to compare the post-operative complains, the hearing results and outcomes of open and closed mastoid cavity. The present prospective study was conducted on 40 patients having attico-antral disease in middle ear cleft. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of 20 each. Out of 40 patients, in 20 patients (Group A) mastoid obliteration was done using conchal cartilage, whereas in other 20 patients (Group B) canal wall down mastoidectomy without mastoid obliteration was done i.e.an open cavity. The patients were followed up post-operatively at 6th week, 3rd month and 6th month. Study Design : comparative study. On Pure Tone Audiometry, 13 (65%) patients with closed mastoid cavity had Air–bone Gap 
ISSN:2231-3796
0973-7707
DOI:10.1007/s12070-021-03011-y