A case report of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in three pulmonary veins presenting a common trunk

Abstract Background The pulmonary vein (PV) variant is present in 23–38% of patients who undergo atrial fibrillation ablation, and the common inferior PV (CIPV) variant is a rare PV variant that has been reported in 0.9–1.5% of patients. The arrhythmogenicity of the common trunk of the CIPV is unkno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal : case reports 2023-01, Vol.7 (1), p.ytac481
Hauptverfasser: Kujiraoka, Hirofumi, Hojo, Rintaro, Takahashi, Masao, Fukamizu, Seiji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background The pulmonary vein (PV) variant is present in 23–38% of patients who undergo atrial fibrillation ablation, and the common inferior PV (CIPV) variant is a rare PV variant that has been reported in 0.9–1.5% of patients. The arrhythmogenicity of the common trunk of the CIPV is unknown. Case summary A 77-year-old woman underwent catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Preoperative computed tomography revealed a common trunk from which the bilateral inferior PVs and a left superior PV originated. The voltage map of the left atrium (LA) showed three PVs stemming from a common trunk. There was a low-voltage area bounded by the common trunk entrance. An isolation line was created to connect the right superior PV and the common trunk. Twelve months later, AF recurred. The voltage map in second session showed residual irregular potentials at the boundary between the common trunk and the LA, and posterior wall isolation was performed. Postoperatively, the patient maintained sinus rhythm with no antiarrhythmic drugs during the 12-month follow-up period. Discussion The CIPV is likely to predict the AF recurrence, even if preoperative voltage mapping shows a low voltage area. Substrate modification should be performed on abnormal potentials at the entrance of the common trunk, even though no potential is detected in the PVs or their antrum.
ISSN:2514-2119
2514-2119
DOI:10.1093/ehjcr/ytac481