Mastectomy with one-stage or two-stage reconstruction in breast cancer: analysis of early outcomes and patient’s satisfaction

Mastectomy with one-stage or two-stage reconstruction in breast cancer: analysis of early outcomes and patient’s satisfaction

Aim of this study is to compare early post-operative outcomes and patient’s satisfaction after skin-sparing and/or nipple-sparing mastectomy (SSM/SNSM) followed either by breast reconstruction with one-stage prepectoral implantation or two-stage technique for breast cancer (BC) or BRCA1/2 mutation....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Updates in Surgery 2023-01, Vol.75 (1), p.235-243
Hauptverfasser: Gurrado, Angela, Pasculli, Alessandro, Toma, Alessia, Maruccia, Michele, Elia, Rossella, Moschetta, Marco, Telegrafo, Michele, De Luca, Giuseppe Massimiliano, Lavermicocca, Walter, Poli, Elisabetta, Prete, Francesco Paolo, Sgaramella, Lucia Ilaria, Giudice, Giuseppe, Testini, Mario
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Adult
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Cancer
Female
Humans
Mammaplasty
Mammaplasty - methods
Mastectomy - methods
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methylene blue
Middle Aged
Oncology, Experimental
Original
Original Article
Patient outcomes
Patient Satisfaction
Questions and answers
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim of this study is to compare early post-operative outcomes and patient’s satisfaction after skin-sparing and/or nipple-sparing mastectomy (SSM/SNSM) followed either by breast reconstruction with one-stage prepectoral implantation or two-stage technique for breast cancer (BC) or BRCA1/2 mutation. From January 2018 to December 2021, 96 patients (mean age of 51.12 ± 10.9) underwent SSM/SNSM and were divided into two groups: in group A (65 patients, 67.7%), mastectomy was followed by one-stage reconstruction; in group B (31 patients, 32.3%) by two-stage. Operative time was significantly longer in A vs. B (307.6 ± 95.7 vs. 254.4 ± 90.91; P  
ISSN:2038-131X
2038-3312
DOI:10.1007/s13304-022-01416-0